Maintain decentralized governance
Preserves autonomy and speed; duplication persists and capital allocation stays opaque.
Engagement narrative — Avalara · 2015–2016
Sixfold growth in three years, 500–700 initiatives in motion, and no unified capital view. A CIO/CFO-sponsored governance overlay created the first enterprise portfolio baseline.
The operating problem
Avalara had grown roughly sixfold in three years through acquisitions and rapid market expansion. IT investment spanned BI, platform services, Salesforce, security, engineering, and product development, with 500–700 initiatives active or proposed at any time. Delivery velocity existed; portfolio clarity did not. Departments prioritized locally, capital allocation lacked a unified view, and executive leadership needed financial accountability without slowing growth.
Options on the table
Preserves autonomy and speed; duplication persists and capital allocation stays opaque.
Immediate standardization, but likely cultural resistance and slower delivery during hypergrowth.
CIO/CFO-sponsored portfolio governance with standardized qualification — while preserving team-level execution autonomy.
What I put in place
What changed
Duplicate and low-value work was pruned and capacity realigned to realistic commitments. Executive conversations moved from anecdotal updates to structured capital sequencing, projects entered delivery with named sponsors and explicit value alignment, and the company gained its first enterprise portfolio baseline ahead of IPO-readiness work.
Why it mattered
Hypergrowth requires governance that scales without strangling innovation. The PPMO enabled disciplined integration of acquired products, protected financial controls during expansion, and restored executive decision architecture under hypergrowth conditions.