Broad attestation campaign
Fast and low-friction, but weak audit defensibility and no structural durability.
Engagement narrative — Microsoft · 2018
Compliance validation had not yet extended to suppliers supporting acquired companies. Nine months of structured remediation closed the gap without disrupting live operations.
The operating problem
As GDPR enforcement began, Microsoft had remediated its core products and centrally governed suppliers — but compliance validation had not yet extended to suppliers supporting acquired entities, many still operating on legacy procurement workflows outside centralized enforcement tools. The scope spanned 362 acquired entities and 9,620 suppliers, 3,424 of them providing GDPR-relevant services, against statutory penalties of up to €20M or 4% of global revenue per violation. Governance integration had lagged acquisition velocity.
Options on the table
Fast and low-friction, but weak audit defensibility and no structural durability.
Strong compliance posture, but high operational disruption across live vendor contracts.
Map the landscape, redesign compliant pathways, secure formal attestation, transition non-compliant vendors, and embed monitoring into future acquisitions.
What I put in place
What changed
A material regulatory blind spot closed in nine months without disrupting active supplier operations. Supplier compliance moved from implicit assumption to a structured M&A governance control, and safeguards now scale with acquisition activity rather than lagging it.
Why it mattered
Acquisition velocity expands regulatory surface area. Extending proven controls into the acquisition ecosystem kept compliance exposure from accumulating invisibly across hundreds of businesses — protecting revenue, reputation, and operational continuity under active enforcement.